Site Announcements

View the results of the New Wave Outpost 20th Anniversary Top Songs Poll here:
http://www.nwoutpost.com/poll/results


Coming Soon: Top Albums Poll. Stay tuned!

Welcome to the new forum!
If you are a previously registered user, you must do the following:

1) Click on 'I forgot my password' at the login prompt
2) Enter your username and email you registered with and submit
3) You will receive an email with an activation link. Please click it and then log in using the random password provided
4) Go to your User Control Panel and click on the Profile tab
5) Click on 'Edit Account Settings' and enter your new password twice followed by the random password provided earlier. Click Submit.
6) That's it...you're back in! You may have to log in again with your new password.


If you forgot your email address, please email me (MikeP) at: mikepaulsen12@gmail.com

Note: you must now use bb code buttons in the Post form for embedded images, YouTube videos, etc.
For example, to post embedded YouTube videos: paste in the link (e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?XYZ1234567), highlight it and then click the YouTube button.

China Crisis Re-Issues


Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby Rubellan » Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:17 am

ABOATES wrote:The original releases were "bassless" because that is how the album sounded and was recorded. They were not bassless at all of course, everything is well balanced. The emphasis on extreme bass and compression was not yet a common practice. If the reissues "add bass" I won't touch them. In my opinion, "remastered" should simply be flat transfers. The purpose is not to make the original recordings sound "different" or "better:. The purpose is to use today's modern technology to accurately portray what was on the master tapes. if bass oomph was not on the original, it should not be added. I can think of two horrid examples off the top of my head that soured me greatly on "remasters"...OMD Dazzle Ships remaster was unlistenable...that album is supposed to be a quaint, charming early synth experimental record but the remster added this huge bloated loud kick drum to it that completely ruined the mix. The The remasters...Dusk in particular was so brickwalled that it actually has distortion in parts. I am of the mindset these days that 98% of the time, the original release be it vinyl or CD sounds the best. On rare occasions to modern engineers get it right.


I disagree. The purpose of "Remastering" is to bring the best out, though that rarely happens these days. I'm a firm believer in giving an appropriate bass boost to thin, hollow sounding tracks. But it's tricky to get it right and you don't want it to sound boomy or thuddy. I've done these enhancement with most things I remaster, and in some cases it really brings out the life in a rather thin sounding song. I thought Dazzle Ships sounded quite nice. Telegraph is one of my favorite songs but it never had any bass, and desperately needed it. Many years ago, I had a remaster rejected because I removed technical glitches (static and distortions). The artist thought they added charm and wanted them in, so they stayed. I disagreed completely.

I was reading on the Steve Hoffman forum a question someone had asked him. They wanted to know if he masters things to sound good to him or what he thinks may sound good to others. He said he masters for his own ears. I agree. I've worked on songs that are originally little more than midrange with no bottom end. I will re-EQ it to give life to what sounded unfinished.
Rubellan
The Jet Set
 
Posts: 934
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 10:59 am
Location:

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby RevUp64 » Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:20 am

^ Like
RevUp64
Switchin' to Glide
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 11:15 am
Location: USA

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby ABOATES » Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:12 am

Rubellan wrote:
ABOATES wrote:The original releases were "bassless" because that is how the album sounded and was recorded. They were not bassless at all of course, everything is well balanced. The emphasis on extreme bass and compression was not yet a common practice. If the reissues "add bass" I won't touch them. In my opinion, "remastered" should simply be flat transfers. The purpose is not to make the original recordings sound "different" or "better:. The purpose is to use today's modern technology to accurately portray what was on the master tapes. if bass oomph was not on the original, it should not be added. I can think of two horrid examples off the top of my head that soured me greatly on "remasters"...OMD Dazzle Ships remaster was unlistenable...that album is supposed to be a quaint, charming early synth experimental record but the remster added this huge bloated loud kick drum to it that completely ruined the mix. The The remasters...Dusk in particular was so brickwalled that it actually has distortion in parts. I am of the mindset these days that 98% of the time, the original release be it vinyl or CD sounds the best. On rare occasions to modern engineers get it right.


I disagree. The purpose of "Remastering" is to bring the best out, though that rarely happens these days. I'm a firm believer in giving an appropriate bass boost to thin, hollow sounding tracks. But it's tricky to get it right and you don't want it to sound boomy or thuddy. I've done these enhancement with most things I remaster, and in some cases it really brings out the life in a rather thin sounding song. I thought Dazzle Ships sounded quite nice. Telegraph is one of my favorite songs but it never had any bass, and desperately needed it. Many years ago, I had a remaster rejected because I removed technical glitches (static and distortions). The artist thought they added charm and wanted them in, so they stayed. I disagreed completely.

I was reading on the Steve Hoffman forum a question someone had asked him. They wanted to know if he masters things to sound good to him or what he thinks may sound good to others. He said he masters for his own ears. I agree. I've worked on songs that are originally little more than midrange with no bottom end. I will re-EQ it to give life to what sounded unfinished.


I understand where you are coming from...it certainly sounds like you have more experience w the process than I do. I agree that it is "tricky" as you say.... of course, if the artist is happy w it, fair enough... In terms of what I purchase and listen to though, I find that 85% of the time, I prefer the original release in whichever format it was on. I listed The The as what I thought was a particularly egregious example of making the album too loud to the point where i could hear digital glitches at times. The original CD of Dusk sounds great as it is...

Two modern bands that come to mind in terms of brickwalling are The National and St. Vincent. Love both bands...esp. St. Vincent, but I find her last two records to be too loud, too bassy, and cluttered...still listen, but the mastering level kind've forces me to turn it down. On the flip side, a couple of recent albums (in similar genres) that I think were mixed well are The Crane Wife by The Decemberists and Transatlanticism by Death Cab for Cutie.
ABOATES
Switchin' to Glide
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 18, 2017 10:51 am

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby dlgladwin » Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:45 am

Has anyone received these yet? How is the sound? Not brickwalled?
-----------------
Born to be hanged
dlgladwin
Running Up That Hill
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 5:38 pm
Location:

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby RevUp64 » Thu Sep 14, 2017 6:38 am

I haven't received mine yet. They're shipping from the UK, so I'm figuring it will take at least 2 weeks.
RevUp64
Switchin' to Glide
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 11:15 am
Location: USA

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby Sean » Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:55 pm

Impatiently waiting for my copies to come. Mail has been slow these days.
Sean
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3104
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 8:56 am
Location:

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby omar » Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:49 pm

Mine despatched today from the UK via Amazon. I'm here in the US , waiting patiently.
omar
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1679
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:51 am
Location: USA

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby moni » Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:31 am

My copy of Flaunt the Imperfection was sent out 2 days before the other two yet i received the other two yesterday and still no sign of Flaunt. Only listened to Difficult Shapes so far but i can tell you that the glitch that was on Performing Seals is still there :x
moni
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1224
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby omar » Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:40 am

was that glitch on the original. Maybe a mastering defect?
omar
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1679
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:51 am
Location: USA

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby moni » Sat Sep 16, 2017 1:07 am

omar wrote:was that glitch on the original. Maybe a mastering defect?

The glitch is on Performing Seals is at the 1 minute and 48 sec mark and i read somewhere it's the same on the original vinyl as well. There is a few mistakes on Flaunt The Imperfection the first being You Did Cut Me (edit) which is printed on the cover is in fact a live version also for the 7 inch mix of Animalistic they have somewhow managed to leave a bit of (A Day At The Zoo Mix) at the end of it. Apart from that the sound is good and they come in digipacks.
moni
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1224
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby ABOATES » Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:33 am

sound any different than the original CD?
ABOATES
Switchin' to Glide
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 18, 2017 10:51 am

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby humanracer » Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:44 am

Shame these aren't available digitally.
Thirtysomething New Wave fan. I've got that Golden Feeling.
humanracer
Personal Jesus
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:19 am
Location: Fife, Scotland

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby digitalbix » Sat Sep 16, 2017 4:48 pm

Just picked up all three sets and can report the sound quality is very good overall, not brickwalled and not from Vinyl or Mp3 sources.
Nice to have the 12" versions and BBC sessions on CD.
digitalbix
Switchin' to Glide
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:22 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby humanracer » Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:16 pm

Finally China Crisis first three albums, Difficult Shapes & Passive Rhythms, the follow up from 1983 Working With Fire and Steel and 1985’s Flaunt The Imperfection have been remastered and released in deluxe editions.

The bonus tracks are well chosen. The live sessions are interesting because, in my view, CC sounded better in smaller venues. The band usually also give the tracks a different arrangement to that of the studio versions. The demos sound as good as the album tracks. The demo entitled Jon and Van does what it says on the tin: it is pretty much an attempt at making a Jon and Vangelis sounding track. It's Never Too Late is one of the best CCs songs and it's baffling why it wasn't even released as a b-side.

One of the best aspects of the remasters is the booklets. Each one features an interview with the band about the era in question and a discussion of the main album tracks. I enjoyed reading about the groups influences which included Brian Eno, Tangerine Dream, Talking Heads and Chic. The band are also quite frank about the people they worked with, even going as a far as to say a particular former member could not play. I was also shocked to read from Daly that his vocals were recorded while he was "under the influence". The band are very proud of their work and this comes through in the interviews. Normally groups tend to be cautious about reappraising their old work or become overly critical but CC have pretty much only good things to say about all of it. They view their first 3 albums as a "trilogy" and that all later albums were a homage to them.

Sound wise, the mastering is acceptable. The dynamic range of Shapes is 12 while the other two are 11. The dynamic range of the recent Duran Duran and a-ha masters, which I found particularly harsh, were 8. 8 is borderline bad in terms of dynamic range. The original CC albums had a DR of 15. The songs are louder which makes them punchier. Normally I don't like this because the originals are punchy enough without need to further compress the sound. However I have always found China Crisis slightly underwhelming on disc so some of the tracks do sound better to my ears. Having said that, with Flaunt, I do find myself going back to the original. If you listen to Black Man Ray on the remaster and then the original, the latter wins hands down.

The albums claim to have been remastered from master tapes.
Thirtysomething New Wave fan. I've got that Golden Feeling.
humanracer
Personal Jesus
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:19 am
Location: Fife, Scotland

Re: China Crisis Re-Issues

Postby ABOATES » Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:14 pm

Thank you very much for the comprehensive review. Wonderfully written!
ABOATES
Switchin' to Glide
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu May 18, 2017 10:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to News, Reissues & Compilations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests