Here I am, wading into the crossfire without my Kevlar...
But anyway
Just now reading the thread about Atheists, and before it degenerated into an enlightened symposia on the definition of defication Motors and Jimbo's disscussion got me to thinking.
For those of you who consider yourself Pro-administration (I'd say pro-Bush, but there are several definitions of that)
What would it take for you to change your mind about the people currently in power in the U.S.
For example let's suppose (HYPOTHETICALS HERE) that Bush came on TV today and announced that he was reinacting the Draft due to the increasing need for solders in the Iraq, and declining recruitment
Or let's say that today a high level cabinet member leaked to the press a memo or tape recording that Bush not only knew about the lack of WMD in Iraq, but had decided months before 911 to go to war using whatever story he needed to to keep the people of America involved?
For the purpose of this let's not debate the veracity of the document above--it IS true. Would that change your support?
Now to the opposite end of the spectrum. For those against the Administration--What would it take for you to support it?
For Example (More hypotheticals, here) Today Bush announces that in Iraq a major Anti-american sect was captured by American forces, and that at their headquarters was a nearly completed "suitcase" atomic bomb?
Again, no need to deabte the truth of the announcement, assume it is true
Or another example: An independant report from the CIA announces the wire-tapping scheme that the adminstration has used has stopped 5 seperate anti-american groups in various stages of planning attacks against the U.S.
My purpose in this is to determine how closing the terms "liberal" and "conservative" fit people who describe themselves as such.
Now let me get out of the way of the crossfire[:D]
