Page 1 of 2
Your solo musical career is an abomination!

Posted:
Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:01 am
by Jimbo
What solo careers should never have been allowed to happen?
Sting; he was good with The Police and not so good by himself. If he ever makes another album, there should be a court ordered Police reunion.
Morrissey; The Smiths were pretty good in their day but Morrissey is now living under a New Wave death fatwah.
Who else's ego got the better of them?

Posted:
Mon Jul 05, 2004 12:52 pm
by EchoBeachBunnyBoy
Ian McCullough
EXCELLENT with the Bunnymen. Not so good solo, or with his side projects...
[}:)]

Posted:
Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:00 pm
by Grunch
IMO only, I think the Ian McCullough and Sting have both done some excellent solo work. I personally like all the Ian solo material, albeit not as much as with EATB, same with Sting. Again, just my thoughts, but Sting has done some exceptionally fine cove

Posted:
Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:18 pm
by devildog
I would say that David Byrne's solo stuff is somewhat disappointing. But Morrissey is probably the worst. I could never warm up to his solo works no matter how much I tried.

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:57 am
by British
Debbie Harry's solo career spawned a bunch of songs nobody cared about. It was no Blondie. Hell, it was no Blondie's "Hunter", which was their worst album.

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 6:04 am
by scramjet
Agree with most of the above, except that I'm not a Sting or Morissey hater. I would add Ric Ocasek and the other Cars to the list.
Turning the question around, who did put out decent stuff as a solo artist after a successful stint in a band? Off the

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 6:15 am
by devildog
Peter Murphy, Annie Lennox, Andy Partridge, Midge Ure, Mark Burgess, and Nick Heyward come to mind as good solo artists. Plus, Peter Koppes, Marty Wilson-Piper, and Steve Kilbey, all from The Church, have excellent and varied solo works.
Actually, for

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 6:56 am
by Frau_Blucher
[quote]Originally posted by scramjet
[br]
Turning the question around, who did put out decent stuff as a solo artist after a succes

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:32 am
by Grunch
Brian Adams after he split up with The Hooters, how about Jim Kerr after The Outfield.

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:39 am
by ghosty
Sorry, Gotta go with Kenny G...er..Sting on this one.
I'm bucking the trend though in liking some of Morrissey's solo stuff. I heard the most recent disc "You Are The Quarry" and found maybe about 2 decent songs there. It seems as if Morrissey is suffe

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:33 am
by Cheetos
Grunch, are you trying to tell us there's another Brian Adams out there? [:0]

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:01 pm
by Dave
Since most solo acts are a big, fat letdown, I think scramjet's question is more interesting... who was *better* after leaving?
Annie Lennox was very good, but better than the Eurythmics or Tourists?? Maybe.
Peter Gabriel? Better than Genesis IMHO,

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 12:42 pm
by SwampThing
I have to defend Morrissey's first solo albumn. It's pretty damn good (it was produced by Stephen Street and featured music by guitarist Vini Reilly). Plus his singles from that period had some great b-sides. Ever heard "Micheals Bones"? Great song. I

Posted:
Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:53 pm
by golfer
Gotta agree with Bryan Adams.....I actually din't think he came from anywhere but Canada[;)]

Posted:
Wed Jul 07, 2004 5:33 am
by KYYX4ever
Andy Taylor, Duran Duran's guitarist, had a horrible solo career. Apparantly, he fancied himself a bit of a faux-metal god. Blech ![xx(]