Site Announcements

View the results of the New Wave Outpost 20th Anniversary Top Songs Poll here:
http://www.nwoutpost.com/poll/results


Coming Soon: Top Albums Poll. Stay tuned!

Welcome to the new forum!
If you are a previously registered user, you must do the following:

1) Click on 'I forgot my password' at the login prompt
2) Enter your username and email you registered with and submit
3) You will receive an email with an activation link. Please click it and then log in using the random password provided
4) Go to your User Control Panel and click on the Profile tab
5) Click on 'Edit Account Settings' and enter your new password twice followed by the random password provided earlier. Click Submit.
6) That's it...you're back in! You may have to log in again with your new password.


If you forgot your email address, please email me (MikeP) at: mikepaulsen12@gmail.com

Note: you must now use bb code buttons in the Post form for embedded images, YouTube videos, etc.
For example, to post embedded YouTube videos: paste in the link (e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?XYZ1234567), highlight it and then click the YouTube button.

Designa Vagina

Reserved for off-topic posts.

Designa Vagina

Postby DonGately » Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:31 am

I'm not sure when we last had a thread title that rhymed with 'vagina'... (also didn't realize that vaginal plastic surgery was that prevelent -- had only heard about once on Stern)...

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1



Australian doctors have raised concerns about clinics offering vaginal cosmetic surgery, warning the trend towards so-called "designer vaginas" may be exploiting vulnerable women.
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said procedures being offered included "vaginal rejuvenation, revirgination, designer vaginoplasty and G-spot amplification".

"What is involved in these procedures is often unclear since recognised clinical nomenclature is not being used," it said in a position paper released this week.

The college labelled the procedures dangerous, expensive and unwarranted, and said it strongly discouraged surgery that was not backed by scientific evidence or clinical trials.

"The real risks of potential complications such as scarring, permanent disfigurement, infection, dyspareunia and altered sexual sensations should be discussed in detail with women seeking such treatments," it said.

The college said women should understand that there were a large number of variations in the appearance of normal female genitalia.

"The college is particularly concerned that such surgery may exploit vulnerable women," it said.

Ted Weaver, chairman of the college's women's health committee, said most of the operations cost at least 10,000 dollars (9,500 US), which he described as an "extraordinary amount of money".

"We feel these operations might prey on people with insecurities and fears who actually need psychological help," he told Australian Associated Press.

"They are also not very anatomically-based and have the potential to cause serious harm."

Doctors in the United States and Britain have raised similar concerns about the surgery.
DonGately
The Jet Set
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 5:23 am
Location:

Postby phillyidol » Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:19 am

The only thing I can say is eeeeeeew!




Worlds GREATEST Photographer!
phillyidol
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 7459
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:35 am
Location: USA

Postby club80 » Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:38 am

I, as a guy, think the surgery idea is totally ridiculous unless there is some sort of hideous deformity that prevents healthy sexual relations.
Variety is the spice of life. Vive la difference!

We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-
club80
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:24 am
Location: USA

Postby phillyidol » Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:51 am

OK, I admit it! I never look.




Worlds GREATEST Photographer!
phillyidol
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 7459
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:35 am
Location: USA

Postby Bitter Almonds » Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:43 am

<p align="justify">I'd think that after one or two vaginal births, things down there are gonna get rearranged. If surgery can get it straightened out, then more power to those who want that[}:)]
Bitter Almonds
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3767
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:27 am
Location: USA

Postby club80 » Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:08 am

Wait a minute!
Was that what the Go-Go's were getting at with "Our Lips Are Sealed"?

We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-
club80
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:24 am
Location: USA

Postby Bitter Almonds » Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:33 pm

<p align="justify">Designa vagina or cooter couture[}:)]
Bitter Almonds
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3767
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:27 am
Location: USA

Postby Bitter Almonds » Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:39 pm

<p align="justify">This candidate might need some cooter couture after this incident[}:)]

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Nxm6wPon5ic&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed>
Bitter Almonds
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3767
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:27 am
Location: USA

Postby hexicon » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:17 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by XXX[/i]
<br><p align="justify">I'd think that after one or two vaginal births, things down there are gonna get rearranged. If surgery can get it straightened out, then more power to those who want that[}:)]
[/quote]

I am not 100% opposed to cosmetic surgery. If a woman wants her "body back"-- say, a tummy tuck after her abdominal muscles have stretched from pregnancy, I am sympathetic. And if a woman has structural damage to her vagina or scar tissue from tears/episiotomy, sure, I can see why she would want the damage repaired for functional purposes.

But some of this genital surgery is purely "cosmetic"--about trimming the labia (the LABIA!! The good parts! The parts with nerve endings!!) to make them *appear* heart-shaped and symmetrical, for example.

Guys, would you shave off some of your "army helmet" solely just so it would *appear* more symmetrical and well-proportioned?
hexicon
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:58 pm
Location: USA

Postby Frau_Blucher » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:56 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by hexicon[/i]
<br>Guys, would you shave off some of your "army helmet" solely just so it would *appear* more symmetrical and well-proportioned?
[/quote]
I would be most circumspect.
Frau_Blucher
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 10195
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 1:37 pm
Location:

Postby club80 » Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:45 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by hexicon[/i]

But some of this genital surgery is purely "cosmetic"--about trimming the labia (the LABIA!! The good parts! The parts with nerve endings!!) to make them *appear* heart-shaped and symmetrical, for example.

Guys, would you shave off some of your "army helmet" solely just so it would *appear* more symmetrical and well-proportioned?
[/quote]

Hexicon, your point is well-taken. "Cosmetic" surgery seems completely unnecessary.

As for the army helmet, no, there is no way I would get it altered. When standing at attention, the army helmet should be fully intact and ready for engagement.

We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-
club80
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:24 am
Location: USA

Postby CounterCircular » Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:51 am

Doctors that tell women they can improve the appearance of their genitals with this cosmetic surgery are just providing lip service. I've never encountered labia I didn't like.
CounterCircular
Personal Jesus
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:38 pm
Location: Denmark

Postby Bitter Almonds » Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:35 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by hexicon[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by XXX[/i]
<br><p align="justify">I'd think that after one or two vaginal births, things down there are gonna get rearranged. If surgery can get it straightened out, then more power to those who want that[}:)]
[/quote]

I am not 100% opposed to cosmetic surgery. If a woman wants her "body back"-- say, a tummy tuck after her abdominal muscles have stretched from pregnancy, I am sympathetic. And if a woman has structural damage to her vagina or scar tissue from tears/episiotomy, sure, I can see why she would want the damage repaired for functional purposes.

But some of this genital surgery is purely "cosmetic"--about trimming the labia (the LABIA!! The good parts! The parts with nerve endings!!) to make them *appear* heart-shaped and symmetrical, for example.

Guys, would you shave off some of your "army helmet" solely just so it would *appear* more symmetrical and well-proportioned?
[/quote]

<p align="justify">Whaaaa...? I thought it was all about the cervix action, which is why chicks dig the big dicks, not the little ones[}:)] It's not like they have to hang 5 lbs weights from their labia or anythin'[}:)]
Bitter Almonds
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3767
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:27 am
Location: USA

Postby hexicon » Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:19 pm

XXX, you asked, I'll answer. (Obviously I can't speak for all women's preferences and sensitivities.)

But, the cervix actually is not that sensitive in terms of nerve endings. In fact, in a lot of gynecological procedures, the docs don't even bother anesthetizing it. Getting a Pap, where the doc scrapes some cells off the cervix with a little brush, feels very strange because you can feel the pressure of the instrument but not the actual scraping sensation, for example.

But, because the cervix responds to pressure, a lot of women find deep thrusting very stimulating. Deep thrusting also may stimulate the G-spot. I also think it's psychologically stimulating. Women are going to have all different kinds of stimulation preferences. But after the clit, the inner labia re the most sensitive part in terms of nerve endings, so I cannot imagine why anyone would willingly cut them.
hexicon
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 12:58 pm
Location: USA

Postby phillyidol » Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:43 am

Cant....stop......puking!!!!!!!!!!![xx(]




Worlds GREATEST Photographer!
phillyidol
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 7459
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 11:35 am
Location: USA

Next

Return to —Not Necessarily New Wave—

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest