New Wave Outpost Forum

by **Jimbo** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 1:00 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by ExRat[/i]
 <blockquote id="quote">quote:<hr he

by **Klaus Von Konrad** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 1:00 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by marvymarv[/i]
 I'm just asking questions this time around.....

On Bush's tax cuts: My wife and I each

by **MARV** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:52 pm

lol, agree if I have the guts? Easy with the hostility dude, I'm not your enemy.....but I'm glad to hear that you agree with me and Bush on low taxes. [;)] Just don't start talking about soldiers self inflicting their wounds and we'll be alright. [:D]

Website · by **savethewave** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:32 pm

It's too bad she's too young, but Ashlee Simpson's ability to spin her lipsynching debacle would be a very promising attribute for a politician.

by **Jimbo** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:27 pm

[b]Germany's largest circulating newspaper endorses Bush![/b]
http://www.bild.t-online.de/BTO/news/20 ... _bush.html

English translation over at [b]Medienkritik[/b]:
http://medienkritik.typepad.c

by **Klaus Von Konrad** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:11 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by marvymarv[/i]
 "We indentified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities."

Why

by **Klaus Von Konrad** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:02 am

This site has a reasonable death count number with ominous graphics as a bonus:

http://iraqbodycount.net/

by **MARV** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:25 am

Well I'm sorry there were Iraqi casualties of war but if Saddam really cared about his people he would have done every single thing in his power to avoid a U.S. invasion. He would not have misled U.N. weapons inspectors and he would have cooperated with u

by **Klaus Von Konrad** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 2:19 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by marvymarv[/i]
And that's what happens in war. If it was'nt such a good idea, why did Congress agree on it?

by **MARV** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 2:43 am

"Marv, you saw a threat in Iraq while I did not. I think the evidence that we have learned since we invaded shows that I am right. You can disagree with me but the evidence is out there and arguing is pointless."

There was a threat in Iraq. Saddam supp

by **Klaus Von Konrad** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 3:16 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by marvymarv[/i]

How is Saudi Arabia responsible for 9/11?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote i

by **MARV** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 3:24 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by Klaus Von Konrad[/i]
 <blockquote id="quote">q

by **Jimbo** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:56 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by Klaus Von Konrad[/i]
I will repeat what I posted before:

Indisputable fact: Three years ago terrorists we

by **Klaus Von Konrad** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:51 am

Guys,

I asked a simple question, and no Bush supporters want to answer it. That's OK as that is what I expected.

The Suadi govt. was supporting the terrorists (at a minimum passively). The Saudi royal family was extorted by the right-wing Islamic

by **Jimbo** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 6:59 am

It's called going after the most immediate threat.
In WW-II Italy was the originating fascist government in Europe but out attention was directed against Germany first because they were the more immediate threat.
The same thing applied to out situation

New Wave Outpost Forum

so who's winning ? bush or kerry ???

Who is online