[quote][i]Originally posted by KYYX4ever[/i]
<br>Actually this guy was a wildlife preservationist and put much of his wealth into animal parks and habitats, as well as wildlife education programs. He put his money where his mouth was.
And a stingray not a dangerous animal like a tiger or lion is ? Think again ! Terrible way to go !
[/quote]
Let me see, Crocodile, Great White Shark, Lion, Stingray... I think I'll take me chances with the stingray, Mate.
Irwin's heart may have been in the right place but he was reckless and ended up paying for it with his life. You can only yank on a lion's tail so many times before you get bitten.
According to http://www.nndb.com/people/577/000022511/
[b]
On 2 January 2004, Irwin found himself embroiled in public controversy after he engaged in a crocodile feeding demonstration while holding his infant son, then only two months old, in one arm while feeding a chicken carcass to the close up croc with the other. In the same incident he was reported setting the infant on the ground beside a pond with a croc in it. The footage appeared on the nightly news, leading locals to call the Queensland Department of Family Services to complain. The Department later reprimanded Irwin, and even acting Premier Terry Mackenroth felt it necessary to express his "concerns with the footage". While members of the press compared the incident to the notorious Michael Jackson baby-dangling incident, the Irwins remained staunchly defensive of the incident, claiming that Steve was in control of the situation the entire time and that the baby was never in any danger. Eventually however, Irwin did concede that, if he had it all to do over again, he might do things differently.
Meanwhile, several months later, Steve Irwin again came under criticism for his antics involving antarctic wildlife. While filming a documentary Irwin allegedly broke both international and Australian federal laws by coming too close to a pod of whales and even sliding down snowy slopes with a group of penguins. Again Irwin utterly denied any wrongdoing, and, after a careful review of the documentary, officials dropped the charges. However there remain those who claim the "real" story of what happened on location, and thus any condemning evidence, was simply edited out of the footage. The Irwins eventually released their own version of both these incidents in a special Crocodile Hunter documentary, Crocodiles & Controversy.
Despite such controversies, and the embarrassment professed by many of his fellow Australians over his hyperactive high-risk antics and Dundeeish cant, Irwin continues to enjoy tremendous popularity and success, especially in the United States. According to Irwin however, the financial fruits of this success have not gone to fuel a lavish lifestyle, but have been channeled into purchasing tracts of endangered habitat to be set aside for wildlife conservation.[/b]
Or as one reviewer on Amazon put it...
[b]
" I would strongly advise teachers and parents to look elsewhere than in any of the Steve Irwin "Crocodile Hunter" series. As a retired biologist and natural historian, I tell you this man and his colleagues are a menace. This video, "Crocodiles of the Revolution" catches some of the most irreponsible and cruel animal "documentaries" I have seen. Our male co-host is a "showboater" and huckster who cares far more about creating lively footage than in being humane to the animals. It is the handling of the second, male, crocodile that is simply beyond the pale. It is done in an utterly irresponsible fashion, with well over a hundred laughing, excited people around to further render the "croc's" move a semi-donnybrook. Good action scenes, but stupid, dangerous animal handling. The risk here is that young people will think this is a proper way to go about handling and moving animals. There are many other great nature series for kids. To learn and be entertained, kids deserve intelligent documentaries just like adults."[/b]
<a href= http://
<a href="http://www.djcraig.net/">DJ Craig</a>
