by KYYX4ever » Fri Aug 27, 2004 4:20 am
[quote]Originally posted by Momotaro
[br]What determines New Wave from Alternative? Time and sound.
I think bpdp3 hit the nail on the head. By 82-83, New Wave was gone. Elvis Costello, Nick Lowe, Lena Lovich...it was all old by then. They had been there and done that. The sound wasn't as new, plain and simple.
To me, by the mid 80's, the labels started to fade a little bit. The sound was called "New Music" by 82, then "Modern Rock" then "Alternative". While it wasn't widely accepted by the masses, the sound wasn't as "new" as it was in 79, if that makes sense.
[/quote]
Yup, I'd agree. Labels or no labels, New Wave WAS kind of alternative in a sense..."alternative" to what was being heavily played on the radio and Kasey Kasem's Top 40. However, "alternative" wasn't really a phrase back then, remember ? The first time I heard "Alternative" being used was in the early 90's with Grunge (Nirvana) and that sort of alt.rock. "Modern Rock" or "College Rock" or "College Radio Music" was one natural result of the early 80's "New Wave". Think about it....the kids who grew up loving NEw Wave were the ones most likely to get into the Smiths/Echo/ etc. Also, since most of us graduated from high school in the late 70's/ early 80's, and went on to college, that was the music we started to hear from our college radio stations. I know that when I went to college ( University of Alaska-Fairbanks) in '86, New Wave was NEVER played. It was this Modern/ College Rock music, unlike anything I'd heard before, and it naturally appealed to a Waver like myself.
In sum, I think New Wave itself was "Alternative", until it sort of faded ( on the radion, anyway)--and then New music naturally morphed into College/Modern Rock ( among other directions). Definately a whole different style of music.
P.S. I LOVE THE SMITHS. Especially the OLD Smiths !![:D]