[quote][i]Originally posted by Blir[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by WolverineSyr[/i]
<br>If that doesn't work for you, try looking at pesticide resistant insects, or antibiotic resistant bacteria. That's evolution.
[/quote]
Your former colleague Eric Lander would be proud! [8D] He, as head of the Broad Institute, just published the Chimp genome sequence and associated article in last month's Nature journal.
http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/200 ... chimp.html
One of the interesting things is his prediction of how many and what type of single nucleotide polymorphism mutations should be in the Chimp genome given what we think we know of evolutionary rates and patterns. The "theories" were dead-on with the newly-sequenced hard evidence - subtle but powerful support for evolution. Nevertheless, Eric, as well as myself, apparently you and many others, also believe in God and can reconcile science and spirituality as not mutually distinct things.
Furthermore, I thought another recent Lander comment about another topic was even more enlightening. It was about the Dalai Lama's response to a question put to him by a scientist who asked about the ethics of using animal tissue or animals in scientific research.
"It would have been so simple for the Dalai Lama to say, 'That is wrong.' But he didn't. Instead he said, 'I can't tell you whether you should or should not do it. There's clearly mixed karma that will arise and will develop 50 years from now,'" said Lander. "He said the karma will depend on the results of the act and the motivation of the researcher. You must ask yourself: What are my motivations? What are the outcomes?'"
"If most of the polarized debates in society could be examined in that way, it would be great. It's interesting that the Dalai Lama would ask, 'What's in your heart?' and include that in the calculus," Lander said.
I'd love to see more of this balanced thoughtfulness rather than the dipshit fundamentalist demagogues polluting Chrisitanity, Islam and many other religions.
[/quote]
I think - I THINK - that the main problem people have with the theory of evolution is speciation and branching off. How does it go from one species into a totally different one? That sort of thing. The question is not whether evolution happened because most scientists worth their salt agree that it did. The major question/revision to the theory is in explaining how speciations happened. If you're into botany and microbiology, this is probably an easy question to research.