by My Aural Stimulator » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:40 am
[quote][i]Originally posted by eight6[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by KYYX4ever[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by eight6[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by KYYX4ever[/i]
<br>I'm fairly neutral on the PCs vs. macs divide, as I'm not so computer-oriented to really be invested in choosing a side.
But boy oh boy ! Our school's computers have been hit HARD by some vicious viruses of late, viruses that have affected the whole school district actually, and the tech people are pulling out their hair trying to get the bottom of it. Awful invectives have been hurled against PCs. Those of us who have Macs in our rooms have escaped this plague, thus far. It's been crazy.
[/quote]
While viruses are annoying and sometimes costly, if a PC is adequately protected with a quality anti-virus, it really shouldn't pose a problem. Also, a bit of self discipline is necessary to avoid opening suspect e-mails.
[/quote]
yes, that is correct. But so far, the tech guys think it is kids who try to Instant Message or check their own emails on school computers. Teachers try to monitor as much as they can, but you know teenagers...sneaky little buggers who secretly hide it. If there are 35 kids in a class, it's hard to look over every one of their shoulders if the teacher is actually walking around and helps kids individually.
Also likely is that the school district [i]doesn't[/i] have the highest quality virus protection. No Child Left a Dime doesn't allocate much money for any of that. The $$ are being allocated to teaching kids how to bubble in tests. But I digress.
[/quote]
By bubble in tests, do you mean artificially overachieve?
If so, our kids both did something called EQAO testing last year. Nearest I can figure is that they use these tests to rate the competency of the teachers/schools. They spent 2 weeks studying specifically what was on these tests. How can that be an accurate indicator of the quality of teaching going on at the school?
[/quote]
It can't. That's been a bone of contention with me for as long as I've been teaching. Public school education has become increasingly corporate-minded in terms of student performance on tests proportional to how much money the district/school receives. How revenue and education ever became bed buddies is beyond me.
But this is a topic for another thread. I believe we're all supposed to bask in the glow of the all-knowing Blir, here.