Site Announcements

View the results of the New Wave Outpost 20th Anniversary Top Songs Poll here:
http://www.nwoutpost.com/poll/results


Coming Soon: Top Albums Poll. Stay tuned!

Welcome to the new forum!
If you are a previously registered user, you must do the following:

1) Click on 'I forgot my password' at the login prompt
2) Enter your username and email you registered with and submit
3) You will receive an email with an activation link. Please click it and then log in using the random password provided
4) Go to your User Control Panel and click on the Profile tab
5) Click on 'Edit Account Settings' and enter your new password twice followed by the random password provided earlier. Click Submit.
6) That's it...you're back in! You may have to log in again with your new password.


If you forgot your email address, please email me (MikeP) at: mikepaulsen12@gmail.com

Note: you must now use bb code buttons in the Post form for embedded images, YouTube videos, etc.
For example, to post embedded YouTube videos: paste in the link (e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?XYZ1234567), highlight it and then click the YouTube button.

Your LEAST Favorite Decade of Music

Reserved for off-topic posts.

Your LEAST Favorite Decade of Music

Postby Spit » Fri Mar 14, 2008 6:09 am

Starting from the beginning of 50's Rock'n'Roll to today, what decade is your LEAST favorite for music ?
Spit
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: USA

Postby enzfan » Fri Mar 14, 2008 6:38 am

Hopefully no will vote the 80's.[}:)]
enzfan
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 2428
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: USA

Postby Spit » Fri Mar 14, 2008 6:54 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by enzfan[/i]
<br>Hopefully no will vote the 80's.[}:)]
[/quote]
lol , I would hope not. Myself , I went with the 1990's. The decade started out ok but by the mid 90's , for the most part , I lost interest.
Spit
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: USA

Postby Spit » Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:48 am

Ok , who's the wise ass that picked the 80's ? [:o)]
Spit
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: USA

Postby New Wave Dave » Fri Mar 14, 2008 10:29 am

The 2000's bite. I'm seriously hard pressed to find more than a handfull of <EM>songs</EM> I like, much less a handfull of <EM>bands</EM> I like.

Even without 80's bands such as U2, The The, DM, TFF, INXS, R.H.C.Peps or The Cure crossing over into the 90's, they (the 90's) still had new bands like Pearl Jam, Smashing Pumpkins, AIC, Soundgarden, Live, 311, Tool and Stone Temple Pilots... Hell, even Bush and Dishwalla each had a decent cd/album.

But then again all the above is mainstream, pablum crap. None of it is from underground, sub-culture, obscure bands that seems to be so popular here.

But the 2000's still suck so that's my story and I'm sticking to it. [:D]

---------------------------
Huh uhh... not Katherine.
New Wave Dave
Take On Me
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:33 pm
Location:

Postby Frau_Blucher » Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:09 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by New Wave Dave[/i]
<br>The 2000's bite. I'm seriously hard pressed to find more than a handfull of <EM>songs</EM> I like, much less a handfull of <EM>bands</EM> I like.

Even without 80's bands such as U2, The The, DM, TFF, INXS, R.H.C.Peps or The Cure crossing over into the 90's, they (the 90's) still had new bands like Pearl Jam, Smashing Pumpkins, AIC, Soundgarden, Live, 311, Tool and Stone Temple Pilots... Hell, even Bush and Dishwalla each had a decent cd/album.

But then again all the above is mainstream, pablum crap. None of it is from underground, sub-culture, obscure bands that seems to be so popular here.

But the 2000's still suck so that's my story and I'm sticking to it. [:D][/quote]
I think you should put yourself out of your misery. Tool indeed.
Frau_Blucher
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 10195
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 1:37 pm
Location:

Postby club80 » Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:37 pm

I had to go with the 2000's. While the early '70's was dreadful, it certainly got better by 1976. The '50's and '60's were, at least, creative. The 90's would fall into a close second behind the current decade but there were high points (I liked the whole Manchester scene of The Happy Mondays, Inspiral Carpets, Charlatans, etc).



We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-
club80
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:24 am
Location: USA

Postby wherewereuin82 » Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:04 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by club80[/i]
<br>I had to go with the 2000's. While the early '70's was dreadful, it certainly got better by 1976. The '50's and '60's were, at least, creative. The 90's would fall into a close second behind the current decade but there were high points (I liked the whole Manchester scene of The Happy Mondays, Inspiral Carpets, Charlatans, etc).



We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-
[/quote]

My thoughts exactly. The early 90's with HM, Inspirals, James etc were great. Then Nirvana showed up blah.

Holy Criznap!
wherewereuin82
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 4353
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:41 am
Location: Canada

Postby club80 » Sat Mar 15, 2008 7:37 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by wherewereuin82[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by club80[/i]
<br>I had to go with the 2000's. While the early '70's was dreadful, it certainly got better by 1976. The '50's and '60's were, at least, creative. The 90's would fall into a close second behind the current decade but there were high points (I liked the whole Manchester scene of The Happy Mondays, Inspiral Carpets, Charlatans, etc).



We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-
[/quote]

My thoughts exactly. The early 90's with HM, Inspirals, James etc were great. Then Nirvana showed up blah.

Holy Criznap!
[/quote]

Then, there was the California retro-punk scene. Rancid had some good stuff and Green Day was good when they stayed away from ballads.



We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-
club80
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:24 am
Location: USA

Postby i_like_lectric_motors » Sun Mar 16, 2008 1:14 am

It was hard but I had to go with the 50's, even though most of the 60's sucked ass. I love these topics ... it's always amusing to see the prematurely geriatric among us bitching about how there's been no good music since 1986.
i_like_lectric_motors
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 6332
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Vatican City

Postby plagiarism » Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:11 am

It was a toss-up between the 50s and 70s, but I went with the 70s. Too much progressive rock wankery, sensitive singer-songwriters, and me-too disco. Let's not forget what the early punks and new wavers were rebelling against.
plagiarism
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3463
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 12:11 am
Location:

Postby Frau_Blucher » Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:08 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by Blir[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by New Wave Dave[/i]
<br>The 2000's bite. I'm seriously hard pressed to find more than a handfull of <EM>songs</EM> I like, much less a handfull of <EM>bands</EM> I like.

Even without 80's bands such as U2, The The, DM, TFF, INXS, R.H.C.Peps or The Cure crossing over into the 90's, they (the 90's) still had new bands like Pearl Jam, Smashing Pumpkins, AIC, Soundgarden, Live, 311, Tool and Stone Temple Pilots... Hell, even Bush and Dishwalla each had a decent cd/album.

But then again all the above is mainstream, pablum crap. None of it is from underground, sub-culture, obscure bands that seems to be so popular here.

But the 2000's still suck so that's my story and I'm sticking to it. [:D][/quote]
I think you should put yourself out of your misery. Tool indeed.
[/quote]
Hmmm. I got a comment from a fellow forumite that he thought I was calling Dave a "tool". Just for clarity, I wasn't. It was simply my own opinion that Tool was a weak example in support of the 90s. Apologies for the over-short reply...but not for its content. I meant only to imply what motors said after, that it's not time to keel over on the music scene yet.
Frau_Blucher
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 10195
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 1:37 pm
Location:

Postby eight6 » Sun Mar 16, 2008 11:42 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by Blir[/i]

Hmmm. I got a comment from a fellow forumite that he thought I was calling Dave a "tool". Just for clarity, I wasn't. It was simply my own opinion that Tool was a weak example in support of the 90s. Apologies for the over-short reply...but not for its content. I meant only to imply what motors said after, that it's not time to keel over on the music scene yet.
[/quote]


Are we going to get e-mail admonishments now if a post could be mis-interpreted?

Thankfully, my posts rarely suffer from ambiguity or mis-interpretation...but come to think of it, being direct generates its fair share of e-mail as well.



<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z302/eight6pics/letmein7-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
User avatar
eight6
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 5807
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:06 am
Location:

Postby schwenko » Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:55 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by eight6[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by Blir[/i]

Hmmm. I got a comment from a fellow forumite that he thought I was calling Dave a "tool". Just for clarity, I wasn't. It was simply my own opinion that Tool was a weak example in support of the 90s. Apologies for the over-short reply...but not for its content. I meant only to imply what motors said after, that it's not time to keel over on the music scene yet.
[/quote]


Are we going to get e-mail admonishments now if a post could be mis-interpreted?

Thankfully, my posts rarely suffer from ambiguity or mis-interpretation...but come to think of it, being direct generates its fair share of e-mail as well.



<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z302/eight6pics/letmein7-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
[/quote]

wow Eight6- you've really made quite a move! How's the weather[;)]
schwenko
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 5392
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2003 12:20 pm
Location: USA

Postby eight6 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:18 pm

[quote][i]Originally posted by schwenko[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by eight6[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by Blir[/i]

Hmmm. I got a comment from a fellow forumite that he thought I was calling Dave a "tool". Just for clarity, I wasn't. It was simply my own opinion that Tool was a weak example in support of the 90s. Apologies for the over-short reply...but not for its content. I meant only to imply what motors said after, that it's not time to keel over on the music scene yet.
[/quote]


Are we going to get e-mail admonishments now if a post could be mis-interpreted?

Thankfully, my posts rarely suffer from ambiguity or mis-interpretation...but come to think of it, being direct generates its fair share of e-mail as well.



<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z302/eight6pics/letmein7-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
[/quote]

wow Eight6- you've really made quite a move! How's the weather[;)]
[/quote]


It could be warmer...actually it's a carefully planned tax strategy.

<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i194.photobucket.com/albums/z302/eight6pics/letmein7-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
User avatar
eight6
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 5807
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 5:06 am
Location:

Next

Return to —Not Necessarily New Wave—

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron