by club80 » Thu Nov 06, 2008 9:25 am
[quote][i]Originally posted by Blir[/i]
<br>Christ, I guess maybe I shouldn't consider myself quite so cynical after all. Election night was very interesting here on a company trip with colleagues from all over the world - Germany, Spain, the UK, Australia, China, Japan, Brazil, etc. There was an intense amount of interest from all my international friends, asking what I was hoping for and what I was feeling, as well as intimating how crushing they thought it would be for the world if it went "wrong". I'd never previously seen others so vested in or hopeful for the outcome of our election. I do think many people see this as being a [i]potentially[/i] special man, and some pointedly argued against this choice being simply more of a rejection of Bush rather than a selection [i]for[/i] something else.
That feeling was further reinfornced on TV in the juxtaposed coverage by CNN and Fox News that I was flipping back and forth from. Interestingly, I thought Fox's coverage was more spot-on than CNN's, who seemed to dwell far too much on the race angle and the emotions of African-Americans in particular - gross oversimplification. Fox on the other hand actually doled out analytical and grudging praise for Obama. Even people like Karl Rove stated that, as they step back and take measure of this man and all that he may be capable of as a leader and a thinker, and with the power of clear majorities in both houses of Congress, he could be a great president - a stunning statement from the architect of the Bush administration.
Brit Hume noted that the trouble with the attacks by McCain and Palin (may the vile whore disappear into oblivion) was that, as one stood speaking with the Obama, none of the accusations of extremism were ever evident in his manner. Instead, one could not help but be compelled by his sincere convictions. This sort of insight was oddly absent in CNN's populist coverage. The next day, even Tom DeLay disagreed with the Fox host that this was just a knee-jerk against the Bush admin. If it was just any old Joe-blow, especially a black Joe-blow, let's face it, he wouldn't have been elected by Americans as we know them.
There seems to be a potentially perfect storm of factors at play here that may give Obama a historical chance of [i]possibly[/i] being a great president - both the aforementioned majorities and the tough times presented to him are often prerequisites for great presidencies. Only time will tell if he becomes great or if he'll blow it - there really can't be much inbetween in this case. Finally, reading some of these comments, I'm not clear if some folks are only qwipping against Obama or were actually for McCain. I would have found his election to be nothing short of a reward and validation for eight years of ignorance. Maybe you were wearing your "I'm With Stupid" shirt during the Bush years??
[/quote]
Well said, Blir. I couldn't agree more. Obama isn't perfect but the stage IS set for him to become a great president. Not only because the Democrats rule Washington and not only because any measurement of competency against the previous regime just HAS TO make him look better, but also because he seems to be more in touch with what the people want and need than Bush did. He know what needs to be done and that alone sets him apart from the Bush Administration. Plus his choice as running mate seems to be the perfect complement. Where Obama is perceived as inexperienced, Biden is strong.
We didn't sell a lot of records, but somehow we left an impression.
-Johnny Ramone-