Site Announcements

View the results of the New Wave Outpost 20th Anniversary Top Songs Poll here:
http://www.nwoutpost.com/poll/results


Coming Soon: Top Albums Poll. Stay tuned!

Welcome to the new forum!
If you are a previously registered user, you must do the following:

1) Click on 'I forgot my password' at the login prompt
2) Enter your username and email you registered with and submit
3) You will receive an email with an activation link. Please click it and then log in using the random password provided
4) Go to your User Control Panel and click on the Profile tab
5) Click on 'Edit Account Settings' and enter your new password twice followed by the random password provided earlier. Click Submit.
6) That's it...you're back in! You may have to log in again with your new password.


If you forgot your email address, please email me (MikeP) at: mikepaulsen12@gmail.com

Note: you must now use bb code buttons in the Post form for embedded images, YouTube videos, etc.
For example, to post embedded YouTube videos: paste in the link (e.g., http://www.youtube.com/watch?XYZ1234567), highlight it and then click the YouTube button.

1989 versus 1969

Reserved for off-topic posts.

1989 versus 1969

Postby Frau_Blucher » Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:21 pm

1969 seems SO long ago. 1989 seems like yesterday. Does it strike anyone else as strange though that 69 is only twice as long ago as 89? That it's already been 20 years since the Berlin Wall came down? Doesn't the moon landing and the launch of the 747 just seem like a LOT longer ago than 40 years, especially compared to 20 years??
Frau_Blucher
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 10195
Joined: Wed May 21, 2003 1:37 pm
Location:

Postby rotator » Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:39 am

I often think about this type of thing ...to me it seemed like a lot more changed between 69 - 89...than 89-09......although I'm sure there is "somebody with a big nose who knows, who'll trip you up and laugh when you fall.." and come up with some sort of statistical information to prove that theory wrong.
rotator
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 3187
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2005 8:30 am
Location: USA

Postby ghosty » Tue Feb 10, 2009 7:05 am

[quote][i]Originally posted by rotator[/i]
<br>I often think about this type of thing ...to me it seemed like a lot more changed between 69 - 89...than 89-09......although I'm sure there is "somebody with a big nose who knows, who'll trip you up and laugh when you fall.." and come up with some sort of statistical information to prove that theory wrong.
[/quote]

Ditto on thinking about this a lot. I remember in the 80's thinking that the 60's were so long ago. Nowadays the 80's seem like only yesterday. I'd go so far as to say that 1997 up 'till today might as well be just one year as far as my memory goes (which is probably not a good thing).

I can tell you from working at a university and being surrounded by kids that they view the 80's in much the same way as I viewed the 60's long ago. To them it's ancient history and 1989 might as well just be 1969 as far as they're concerned (and we all rode dinosaurs to work, etc.). They were all born in the 90's and think of Nirvana as "oldies". lol
ghosty
Room at the Top
 
Posts: 1892
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:37 am
Location: USA

Postby Terim » Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:06 am

Darned perspective...
Terim
Personal Jesus
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 11:05 am
Location: Canada


Return to —Not Necessarily New Wave—

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest