by schwenko » Mon Jun 14, 2004 10:22 am
[quote]Originally posted by ghosty
[br]While an unabashed Kylie fan, I can't consider her New Wave primarily because I lock New Wave into a time period (late seventies to mid-80's). That's probably a controversial stance to take in this group. Certainly there are acts who came on the scene during that era and yet continue to record to this day. While I might refer to them as New Wave acts, I don't think of New Wave music as an ongoing concern, just a label used to define a certain sound from a certain time period. Same with Alternative. That's my way of looking at it anyway. I don't expect everyone to fall in line with that because we all have our own interpretations.
For example, if you say Psychedelic Rock just about anyone will immediately think of the 60's and yet there were Psychedelic-sounding records released last year! Are those records made in the same spirit as their original 60's counterparts or are those records merely an affectionate tip of the hat to a bygone era?
It's these sorts of questions, however, that keep the discussion of music interesting.
[/quote]
I agree 100%. It refers to a time-period, as well as a style, and also an attitude.