[quote][i]Originally posted by marvymarv[/i]
<br>[quote][i]Originally posted by WaverBoy[/i]
<br>Additionally, I resent the assertion that I or anyone else may have been posting out of a "hey, look, I've got lots of cool stuff too!" attitude.....[/quote]
Waver, I hope you were'nt offended by any of my comments as I certainly did not mean to subversively imply that you have made any irresponsible posts. I know that you, Synthpop, MSK Remember, and a few others have put up some very valuable, rare, hard to find and out of print material by artists no longer under the auspices of a record label or by now defunct labels. In addition I'd like to add that the majority of material posted falls into this category. But we have had a few instances of people putting up relatively mainstream stuff. In fact, now that I think about it I think I made a post or two like that in my recent Pet Shop Boy collaboration commentary [B)] The legalese can become quite vague also when it comes to television and radio broadcasts as the intellectual property falls into the ownership of the broadcast company and not the artist. What if that company no longer exists? I'm certainly no expert in these matters but just want to throw in a little more to think about. I dunno, none of us are experts so I really feel it's prudent that we err on the side of caution. We have a great thing going on here. Let's not ruin it.
[/quote]
MarvyMarv, no worries, you're still Marvy in my book.
My beef was mainly directed at a comment made by eight6.
And I agree emphatically that no readily available stuff should be posted here. If someone requests a song that still happens to be in print, then he or she can be directed as to where to buy it. Likewise, if someone posts a song that is still in print, he or she can be politely advised of such, and the link can be removed.